Thursday, May 30, 2019

When You Put Your Dog On Display



Apparently, the folks who put dogs on display at dog shows are a little unclear that their dogs are on display (hence the word "dog show") and can be photographed by others at these shows.

What this means is that if you breed and show dogs that look like miserable wrecks, don't be too shocked if photos of them appear on the Internet as examples of morphological dysfunction.

Now, I consider it bad form to single out the owners of these dogs by name, and I generally do not name the dog itself, as it's always best to focus on principles rather than personalities.

That said, when a dog wins at a show, the animal's name and the owner's name are trotted out all over, so if a dog is a monument to dysfunction, perhaps it should also work the other way around? I can see the point, though I myself chose not to observe it.

The dog here, of course, is a Dogue de Bordeaux with pinched nostrils (I do not think the term "stenotic nares" does much to illuminate the issue with the public) who will be in some form of respiratory distress almost every moment of its life.

Other breeds that frequently have the same problem include the English Bulldog, the Boston Terrier, and the Pug, to name just three.

What's it feel like to be this dog?

Basically, every moment of your life would feel like you were being "water boarded" or nearly suffocated.

But don't take my word for it; go ahead and pinch your own nostrils almost shut, and then try to breathe like that for just 10 minutes on your watch.

How's that working for you?

Yet the Kennel Clubs have whistled past the graveyard with this problem for decade after decade.

And no, the term "graveyard" is not a metaphor.

The average Dogue de Bordeaux is dead at just 5 and half years of age.

Let's be clear that intentionally breeding dogs like this is institutionalized animal abuse.

No wonder the Kennel Club is now terrified of cameras at dog shows, and no wonder that owners of dogs like this don't want to be identified.

Who wants to me associated with keeping dogs in permanent misery?

Who wants to be associated with breeding defective dogs that will require expensive surgery to not be in permanent misery?

Of course, the solution is simple: Stop breeding dogs like this, and start disqualifying dogs that look like this from participating in shows.

Dogs shows, after all, are supposed to be improving dogs.

It's hard to see how anyone can say that is actually being done when breed after breed is selected for such obvious defects as smashed in faces, wrecked backs, dysfunctional coats, dwarfism, excess skin, coat colors associated with eye and ear dysfunction, and even baldness, to say nothing of the requirement that these dogs then be inbred within laughably small closed gene pools in order to preserve the painful and misery-causing mutations and dysfunctions.

Breeding better dogs?

Better for WHAT?

Not for health, which is afforded ZERO points.

Not for temperament, which is afforded ZERO points.

Not for work, which is afforded ZERO points.

If dog owners and the Kennel Club are proud of these creations, then they should not fear the camera, OR the veterinary evidence.

The fact that they are NOT proud, however, tells you quite a lot -- it shows a certain level of mens rea or scienter -- the kind of thing a court might consider if animal abuse charges ever were filed against the Kennel Club or a dog breeder.

A Herald of Destruction



Pretenders have always been with us.

Anyone who doubts that need only look at the "Dogs of the Day" column in the November 21, 1931 edition of the Illustrated Sporting and Dramatic News, in which A. Croxton-Smith writes of "Working Terriers on the Show Bench". The article is appended below.

Does this sound very much like the drivel we hear today -- a picture of a woman posing next to her show dogs, and claiming knowledge of working terriers because she once walked a few miles off the asphalt?

And the Fox Terrier is still worked?

Not anymore!

The Border Terrier is too small?

Not anymore!

Within a few decades of this pretender prattle, both of these breeds were nearly invisible in the field, leaving open a space for the rise of the Jack Russell Terrier (not a Kennel Club dog) and the Patterdale Terrier (not a Kennel Club dog).

And who helped usher in the wreckage? 

Why none other than the author of this article -- Arthur Croxton Smith, who was chairman of the Kennel Club from 1937 to 1948 when the wholesale destruction of both dogs and breeds reached a furious pace.


"Working Terriers on the Show Bench" by A. Croxton-Smith


WHENEVER a new breed of working terriers is introduced to the show bench, some of their supporters are sure to view the departure with a certain amount of anxiety, in the belief that they may fall into the hands of breeders who know nothing about field sports. In the course of time, they say, terriers will be produced that are of no earthly use except as show specimens.

By standing aloof, however, they are contributing to the danger they are desirous of avoiding. There is no reason at all why a working dog of any sort should not be bred to a certain standard of excellence by those who wish to do so. Good looks in themselves are no indication of a faint heart or weakened constitution, nor are crooked legs, goggle eyes, round skulls and weak jaws the hall mark of working capacity, as many infer.

As a rule, exception cannot be taken to the standards framed for the guidance of breeders, most of which describe an ideal that should make dogs better able to perform their legitimate duties. The mischief comes in when certain exaggerations are developed almost unconsciously, destroying the balance and symmetry.

Though fox terriers have been bred for the show ring for over sixty years, they are just as useful as ever to masters of foxhounds, some of whom keep dogs from pedigree strains. There are misfits, of course, among show dogs as there are in workers, but it would not be fair to condemn all for the shortcomings of a few.

We have many breeds of dogs of all kinds of which we should be proud, and I think it is an advantage that their special characteristics should be preserved and improved, just as we take a pride in our farm animals.

The curious thing is that such a number of distinctive terriers should not have been developed until the last few years, The latest to lay claims to an individuality are the Lakeland terriers, which have been recognized by the Kennel Club within the last few years.

Until the formation of the Lakeland Terrier Association, in 1921, they passed under several names, one of which was Patterdale terriers. No doubt they are a mixture of several breeds, but in the course of time certain strains have been kept pure and the standard has taken the best of these for its model.

We are illustrating this week a team belonging to Mrs. Douglas Paisley. In 1928 Mr. Paisley wrote to me in the following terms "I have had this breed of terriers on and off for well over twenty years, and have known them a great deal longer, as I have hunted with the Blencathra Foxhounds, one of the five-foot packs of foxhounds hunting the Lake District, in which these Lakeland terriers have been used almost exclusively for thirty years. I have kept a careful record of my terriers' pedigrees and all go back to old working blood. The Lakeland terrier is quite a distinct breed from the Border terrier, which was unknown in this part of Cumberland (Thornthwaite, Keswick) until quite recently, and we only have very few now, as they are generally too small to stand the work in this rough country."

Mr. Paisley sent me a photograph of some of his terriers, all of which had been bred to work, but at the same time they had all won prizes at local shows in 1925-6, and one of them, a dog called Tinker, received the gold medal offered by the association for the dog winning the greatest number of points at shows in those years. The Lakeland terriers are a little taller and heavier than the Borders and they are usually blue, blue-and-tan, black and tan, red, mustard, wheaten, grizzle, and black."

Wednesday, May 29, 2019

Arthur Heinemann Writes of Badger Bagging in 1907




Arthur Heinemann was born in the US in 1871, and was besotted with dogs and hunting — a rare enough thing in any group, but particularly rare in the Jewish community.

Immigrating to the UK as a child
, Heinemann became interested in badger digging when he was in his very early 20s.

In 1894, he created the Devon and Somerset Badger Digging Club -- a small regional club composed of similar like-minded friends. In 1902 he bought the Cheriton Otterhounds, but he sold them in 1905. He died in 1930, at the age of 60, after catching pneumonia while out coursing his dogs on a cold and miserable January day.

The article, below, is from “The Illustrated Sporting and Dramatic News” of November 9, 1907.

———————————-

BADGER-DIGGING by Arthur Heinemann


“IGNOTUM omne pro mirifico" is nowhere better exemplified than in badger-digging and otter-hunting, and there are more fallacies popularly held about both the otter and the badger themselves, and their pursuit as well, than about any other beast of the chase.

Even today there are many people to whom badger-digging with terriers, or badger-hunting with hounds, conveys nothing more than badger-baiting, that word being in the popular mind indissolubly associated with poor Uncle Brock, just as there are many who, to this day, picture to themselves otter-hunters sallying forth armed with long-poled spears on which to impale hapless Lady Lutra.

Yet for many years
badger-baiting has been an obsolete and illegal sport (if ever sport it was), and for half a century or more the otter-hunter has ceased to use the unsportsmanlike spear, though for his own safety in fording rivers and fathoming their depths, he still carries the harmless pole to which the spear used to be attached at the psychological moment. Not as one ingenuous maiden once suggested to me, with the object of prodding the otter and making him go faster!

About the badger's habits and formation especially are fallacies rife.

I have a print or two in which they are depicted with cloven feet, for there were supposed to be two sorts of badger, the ordinary and the swine-badger; and perhaps it is from this that we get the term of boar and sow for the male and the female badger.

Nor is it an uncommon experience for yokels to ask me to show them which is the shorter leg the badger is held to possesses to enable him to travel the better on sidling ground.

Then most keepers will tell you badgers suck eggs, quite forgetting to mention the very many other articles of diet that appeal more to them: young rabbits, slugs, snails, beetles, wasp-grubs, underground nuts and roots of wild arum lily, hyacinth, buttercup, etc.

And it is because this oldest and most retiring of British mammals today extant shuns the fierce light of day and publicity as well that those who know little or nothing about him have thus given rein to the wildest flights of their imagination, for there are even modern natural history textbooks which will tell you badgers kill lambs, and to stink like a badger is a saying that is a gross libel on one of the most cleanly animals imaginable in all his habits.

Poor Brocky every man's hand seems to be against you, and the crime of vulpicide is (often wrongly) laid at your door.

Yet, thanks to your nocturnal habits and the skill you show as an architect of labyrinthine mazes below ground in some impregnable rocky tree-trunked fastness, you can still hold your own in many parts of the kingdom, your presence often unsuspected, till one who runs to read the book of Nature slots your plantigrade imprint in the soft soil of moorland track or covertside.

Lovers of Nature and all her children are still to be found in this over-populated land of ours who hold their protecting aegis over Uncle Brock, while many a badger-digger, by rousing local interest and showing himself merciful even in the hour of victory, does much to ensure the preservation of the bold British badger.

It is no uncommon experience for keepers to ask me to spare the sow badgers, and for farmers to ask me to give some fresh-caught captive his liberty on their farm, that they, equally with their neighbors, may have another year a badger colony to provide the sport of a day's dig. And so it has come about that following in the footsteps of several of my predecessors of like benevolence towards the badgers, I have been enabled to change badgers from Devon to Somerset, and vice-versa, thus ensuring a healthy stock and enabling me to dig out literally hundreds.

The great trouble is that there is no close-time provided by law for the badger, who lays down her cubs in February and March, and even earlier I have reason to believe, though ‪February 1st‬ is the earliest date on which I have actually found cubs. And then too, with the close of the shooting season, keepers have more time to devote to the destruction of vermin, as they too often regard badgers, so that many a badger-dig is, to suit their convenience, put off till the very time when Mrs. Brock is busy with her nursery duties and anxieties.

There may be some who ask what is the object of badger-digging if you are a friend of the badger? Well, I can only say that if there was no fun to be had out of a dig the farmers and others would not preserve badgers, as so many of them do so well, and trap and poison would soon play havoc in their ranks. I know of districts where badgers are neither hunted nor dug, with the result that they are barbarously stifled with sulphur in their earths. A badger-dig satisfies the bloodthirsty farmer, who sees the badger dug out and bagged and carried away, though he may not see him "slipped" on the way home, and on the principle of the heart not grieving over what the eye does not see, all parties are contented while for a pleasant meeting of neighbors, some exciting sport, a pleasant alfresco lunch, and a friendly chat and joke, there is no time or place like a badger-dig.

Those great fox earths that save so many foxes from being found, or are the despair of huntsmen and the disgust and disappointment of hounds after a long run, are so bisected by badger-diggers that the hunt terriers can easily bolt a fresh or beaten fox from them, thus conferring a boon on the fox-hunting community, who could not, give a day to digging a fox.

Not but what great care is necessary not to put too hard a terrier or more than one to ground, till you are sure a badger is the sole tenant of an earth, and not to bury or smother a fox if one is found there.

If you stop digging ‪on February 1st‬, you will not run much risk of chopping fox cubs, but accidents will happen, though rarely even in the best regulated families. I have only had two in twenty years.

But any accidental harm done is surely atoned for by the goodwill towards fox-hunting a hunting man badger-digging can promote by word and deed. It is a famous opportunity of meeting and entertaining your farmers, and to fill up the dull days of a period of frost and snow.

I remember once hearing a farmer say, "I hope its a fox." "I hope it isn't," answered the badger-digger. "Oh! I'm no friend to a fox," said the farmer. "I'm sorry to hear that, said B, before all the company, “you had better go to the parish-room yonder, where they're conducting a. mission, and get converted." Needless to say, the laugh was against "anti-fox."

Perhaps badger-digging as a sport is strong meat for weak stomachs, caviar to the multitude, to use more elegant language, but certainly it is full of wildly exciting incidents. Again, there is no finer school for working terriers.

One might posses a hundred terriers and not know their worth were it not for badger-digging, which demands not only pluck on the terrier's part, but also the quality of threading the intricate maze of Brock's underground galleries in search of the quarry, and many a terrier will scamper through an earth and reappear with the verdict -- blank -- writ large to locate his quarry, who is lying all the time in some butt-hole or cul de sac, or on some shelf or ledge above his head.

Then, when once located, you want a terrier who possesses doggedness enough to lay up to him, baying every second when fronting the foe -- hard words -- to tell you where to dig, and giving him, when he turns, hard blows or nips to prevent his digging on or burying himself before bisgay and shovel shall have reached the scene of conflict.

Certain terriers have all these qualities bred in them for generations, but practice makes perfect, and badger-digging develops them to the pitch of perfection, as running with foxhounds or otterhounds can never do, for to give only one instance, these sports do not allow of the necessary delays required.

Badger-baiting, when the badger is once unearthed, is, apart from its cruelty, quite useless in the training of terriers, either making them too hard or cowing them altogether.

In badger-digging there is no cruelty unless it be in disturbing the peaceful slumbers of such a sleepy old gentleman as Uncle Brock, for no terrier's teeth can hurt his tough hide, and I have only once known him come to a bad end, and that was when he had buried himself to reach a branch pipe, only to find another badger in front of him, blocking ventilation. The result was fatal to Mr. Brock, though Mrs. Brock was taken out alive and well. But this was one of those unfortunate and unforeseen accidents that will happen in the best regulated families.

The most interesting part of badger-digging is the reconnoitering of the "terrain," the day before, or harbouring, to borrow a stag-hunting phrase -- the high-heaped pile of stones and earth -- the well-worn path padded by the plantigrade beast -- the litter of moss, ferns, twigs, or grass, he has drawn in to make his luxurious bed -- the tree-trunk beside the earth smeared with the mud the badger always wipes off his feet -- the long black hairs with their grey tips that are to be picked up at the entrance to his subterranean stronghold.

And then the dig itself; eager terriers straining on their chains, eyes fixed expectantly on their master, the old depending dog selected to draw the earth, to the disappointment of his fellows. Men lying prone, ear to ground, to catch the opening challenge; then horn and voice ring out, cheering to the echo old Bingo or some other local champion. Then the plying of bigsay, shovel, and pick, sinking trench after trench, mine and countermine, till the badger is cornered, and the scene of conflict is laid bare. Deeper and deeper retreats Uncle Brock, undismayed and undisturbed at these onslaughts on his stronghold, until he can go no further, and with teeth gnashing to right and left he emerges into the trench, and is promptly tailed and dropped into the bag, only, maybe, to be turned out when darkness descends on his native wilds, or to be transported to some more distant district and given his liberty, as he bundles off in the gathering gloom with his ungainly gait.

The terriers alone are the sufferers, for they have not made any impression on his tough hide, but if dressed at once with the writer's recipe (not to be given away with a pound of tea!) there will be little swelling next day, and no ill-effects. More often the badger remains master of the situation, having defied perhaps ‪from noon to midnight‬, as once happened this winter, the best efforts of men, tools, and terriers to unearth him.

February and March, April, too, if possible, should be allowed as a time of grace to Mrs. Brock, and badgers in winter are in all their pride of grease and coat, though I know a man who says a summer badger is livelier than a winter one. Your terriers, however, will work better below ground in winter than in the stifling heat of summer.

Last winter badgers were unusually plentiful in Devon and Somerset, twenty-three digs yielding thirty-eight badgers, four of which were cubs. One earth held five, another earth four (I have in years past unearthed six full-grown badgers from one earth, and have heard of seven being brought to light). Of these thirty-eight no less than twenty-three were sows; there were also thirteen boars, and two whose sex was not ascertained. Seven of the boars who were weighed turned the scale at 32 lb 30 lb, 30 lb., 29 lb, 24 lb, 19 lb, 19 lb. Fourteen of the sows- - 32 lb, 31 lb, 31 lb, 30 lb, 28 lb, 27 lb, 27 lb, 25 lb, 24 lb, 24 lb, 24 lb, 23 lb, 22 lb, 21 lb. Of the thirty-eight only nine were killed, six escaped, and the rest were transported into fresh districts.

Terrier Bags on Horses











Terrierman and Bicycle





A New Royal



This remake of The Lion King looks awesome!

Tuesday, May 28, 2019

Drowning Dogs at the End of the Dock



In the late 19th century, un-neutered dogs mated and whelped freely in our cities and countryside, spreading rabies and terrorizing horses and people alike. Some cities and towns hired dog catchers, but others paid bounties to have dogs delivered to kill centers.

New York City paid bounties for dogs seized on the street and delivered to the East River along 26th street where they were loaded into iron cages and drowned at the end of the dock at a site called “the canine bath tub.”

One drowning episode in 1877 involved the killing of 738 full-grown dogs and about 20 puppies. An an 1877 article described the mechanics of the scene:

A large crate, seven feet long, four high and five broad, made of iron bars set three inches apart, was rolled up the aisles, and the dogs, about 48 at a time, were dropped into it through a sliding top door. The crate was then wheeled out to the water’s edge, where it was attached to a crane, elevated, swung out and dropped into the river, where it was kept submerged 10 minutes, then it was lifted up, emptied and returned for another load. The carcasses were disposed of to the rendering establishment at the foot of twenty-eighth-street, where it is said, their hides have an average value of $1 apiece.

In 1894, New York City stopped paying bounties, but the killing did not end; now it was done by the “humane” movement, who soon discovered that engine exhaust worked almost as well as water, and was certainly a lot less public.

A Friendly Face on the Trail


This black rat snake was sunning himself on the tow path yesterday.

Monday, May 27, 2019

Taxidermy With Dog and Terrier



This is turn of the century taxidermy, with a dog that looks so much like ones I’ve owned, that it’s a bit spooky.

I’m pretty sure this kind of taxidermy is not seen too often anymore!

I don't think it's quite accurate either; if a dog can almost never pull a 15-pound groundhog from the earth (and it's not easy for a 200-pound man to to tail one out if its jammed in hard inside a dirt pipe), I think no terrier could do the job on a 20-30 pound badger.

Sunday, May 26, 2019

Doe and Fawn This Evening





Never Out-Foxed



My friend finally agreed to marry his long-time significant other.

One evening, after the honeymoon, he was in the garage cleaning out his pack and sharpening a shovel, when his wife came to the door.

After a long period of silence she finally said, "Honey, I've been thinking - now that we are married we should spend more time together. I think it's time you quit spending so much time on the dogs. Maybe you could sell some of these tools and reduce the number of terriers."

My friend was startled, and a horrified look crossed his face.

She said, "Oh, darling, what's wrong?"

He said, "For a minute there you sounded just like my ex-wife."

"Ex-wife!" she exclaimed, “I didn't know you'd been married before!"

He replied, "I haven't!"

Our Meat-Eating Prophets



Moses and Jesus were not vegetarians... and neither was Mohammed.

Jesus was a Jew and, as such, was raised in a world in which the Torah -- the most sacred book of God -- was not only made of animal skin, but wrapped in animal skins as well.

His was a world of sheep and goats, camels and donkeys, horses, and mules.

Sheep and goats were routinely sacrificed and eaten, just as they are today. Larger pack animals were used to the very edge of their miserable existence, and then they were killed and skinned for water bags, saddles, drums, shoes, bags, and cord -- just as they are today.

While the Bible is not quite a recipe book, it does have instructions. In Deuteronomy 14 we are told:

These are the animals you may eat: the ox, the sheep, the goat, the red deer, the gazelle, the roe deer, the ibex, the addax, the oryx, and the mountain sheep. Any animal that has hoofs you may eat, provided it is cloven-footed and chews the cud.... "Of the various creatures that live in the water, whatever has both fins and scales you may eat...You may eat all clean birds.

Jesus was born in a manger -- a place where beasts of burden and service are housed.

The story in the New Testament is not of loaves and Tofu, but of loaves and fishes, and it was fish -- a living thing -- that was killed and which Jesus fed to his followers.

In Mark 7:19 Jesus says all meat is now OK to eat (a major legal difference between the Old and New Testaments), and in Luke 22:8-15, Jesus intructs his followers to prepare lamb for the Last Supper.

Add to this the story in Samuel where the fox's tail is set on fire to help torch the fields of the Philistines (made famous in the Rudyard Kipling poem, "The Fox Meditates"), the Old Testament tales of frogs falling from the sky (not a good day for the frogs, I suspect), and the wholesale drowning of animals (see the Great Flood in Genesis and the un-parting of the Red Sea in Exodus), and it's clear that God is not a PETA member.

We have more direct evidence, of course. If God made man in his own image, as the Bible says, then God has canine teeth.

Try to reconcile that with vegetarianism.

God did not make man alone, of course. He also made spiders which bind up living things, inject them with poison, and then eat them alive, one piece at a time.

God made the hawk which will rip the head off a fluttering sparrow still grasped in its claw.

God made the fox, which will chew the hind legs off a living mouse so that the flapping rodent can serve as a toy for its kits.

In short, God made nature, red in tooth and claw, and I assure you it is not all a mistake.

Friday, May 24, 2019

Never a Good Sign



Call a priest.... it’s god spelled backwards, and it wants to “play”.

Thursday, May 23, 2019

Fox Size: Same As It Ever Was



In Foxes, Foxhounds & Foxhunting, written in 1923, Richard Clapham notes that:

With regard to the weights of foxes, these differ considerably in various parts of the country. Roughly speaking the average dog fox weighs about 15 lb, and the vixen 13½ lb. It is quite safe to say that nowadays there are far more foxes under than over 16 lb.

Wildlife in the Parking Lot



Wednesday, May 22, 2019

The Future Is Here

Don't Mix Them

Sandpiper in a Freshwater Marsh



A Sandpiper of some sort. Despite having worked for a big green bird group for a number of years, I am simply too impatient with male/female, adult/adolescent, summer/spring/winter plumage shifts, to say nothing of badly illustrated bird books and frequent hybridization, to drill beyond type for certain groups.

Tuesday, May 21, 2019

Peering Out From a Hidden Burrow



Monday, May 20, 2019

Tougher Than They Looked



This Iditarod Standard Poodle Team (they placed in the middle of the pack) ran from 1988 thru 1991.

Sunday, May 19, 2019

Chronic Lyme is a Fake Diagnosis


I’m no fan of pharma, having battled them at a pretty high level for 20 years.

That said, I am a fan of results-oriented medicine, and an opponent of quackery.

If you run dogs in forest and field in the US, you will get ticks and there is always a risk of Lyme.

This article is interesting in that it says three things:


  1. There is no such thing as “chronic Lyme disease” -- this is a fake diagnosis;
  2. There ARE people with persistent long term problems after Lyme has been eradicated from their body (perhaps an autoimmune problem triggered by the now-gone Lyme);
  3. Antibiotic dosing for something you no longer have is very bad medicine.

Read the whole thing.

Saturday, May 18, 2019

A Common Jewel



If ducks were not common, I think we would put them in aviaries and charge admission to see them

Friday, May 17, 2019

Almost Stepped On This One!

Assumed and Relative Risk



A little over 12 years ago I wrote:

When push comes to shove, we are going to get to a place in the next 20 years or so when conservation and preservation of predator species is going to be less of a concern than sensible management.

I think we are very nearly there.

Now I think we need to have a national talk about relative and assumed risk.

I bring this up because every once in a while a mountain lion attacks a jogger or bicyclist.

When a human is attacked, trackers with hounds fan out and the big cat is invariably shot and killed.

I am not second-guessing the removal of these mountain lions; no sensible person would. That said, it does take you down the path to risk analysis and response.

A bicyclist is far more likely to die from cholesterol-choking cheese, a car accident, or alcohol poisoning, than from a cougar attack, and yet we do not ban these associated products -- we heavily promote them.

Cougar, wolf and grizzly bears are inherently dangerous animals -- they will attack and kill you under certain circumstances. That said, those circumstances are sufficiently rare that it is very clear that it does not take too much effort to tip the scale to the point that the lion, bear, or wolf thinks better of the arrangement. You can do things to reduce attack, and you can take precautions.

When I go into the woods in deer season on a Saturday, for example, I assume the risk of being shot. I lower that risk if I wear an orange hat or vest.

When I walk solo through the Smokies just as black bears are leaving their dens in the spring, I assume the risk of a chance encounter. I lower that risk if I sing loudly as I go up the trail, and occasionally bang my walking stick against a rock.

If I mountain bike alone, I assume the risk of pitching down a ravine and bleeding out. I lower that risk if I travel with someone else, wear a helmet, and carry a cell phone.

The point is that similar steps can dramatically reduce your risk in cougar, bear, and wolf country, and those steps are not particularly onerous. Carry a walking stick and wear a hat and know the value and use of both. Do not engage in long-distance running or biking on brushy slopes in cougar country, and pack your food and pans away from your tents, and up a tree, in bear country.

Above all, however, realize that the chance of attack is extremely remote and that your odds of attack can be reduced to near-zero by taking a few common-sense precautions.

You cannot teach a wolf or cougar to be a vegetarian, but you can teach humans a few common sense tips that dramatically reduce the risk of attack.

Finally, remember this: When you are in the woods, you are far more likely to be killed by a swarm of bees, a falling tree, or a lightning bolt than you are by a bear, lion or wolf.

If you want to live in fear, live in fear of bees.

No Shortage of Food in the Fields

Thursday, May 16, 2019

A Flash in the Hedge



Redwing blackbird on poison ivy. There’s so much poison ivy in our hedges and fields that if I took mind of it, I would never leave the house.

Wednesday, May 15, 2019

Green Heron



A nice bird that will generally let you photograph it if you don’t put too much pressure on it.

Tuesday, May 14, 2019

Animal Travel Lanes



Deer and other animals use creek and drainage bottoms like this as highways. The banks shield them from people. Tracking individual animals in snow can teach you a lot — and though the sign is less visible in warmer months, the general rules of movement (food, water, shelter, travel lanes) still apply.

Sunday, May 12, 2019

Have You Ever Noticed?



HAVE YOU EVER NOTICED how many folks who have complicated theories about dog training are afraid to walk their own dogs off leash in forest or field?

HAVE YOU EVER NOTICED how many “people of the curve” who are “big boned” have complicated theories about food and health which involve spending a lot of time in the kitchen?

HAVE YOU EVER NOTICED that the Kennel Club experts on retrievers and pointers don’t own shotguns ... that the experts on sled dogs live in Texas .... and that the experts on terriers are chasing ribbons and not digging holes?

Bar Soap to Neutralize Poison Ivy



Poison Ivy is one of the burdens of American terrier work -- it's out there, and you will get it if you work enough hedgerows.

Poison ivy, poison oak, and poison sumac are all in the Rhus family of plants, and these plants produce more cases of contact dermatitis than all other substances combined.

Poison ivy skin rashes are not contagious -- only the toxic oil of the plant (urushiol) causes the poison ivy reaction, and generally it has to be on your skin for an hour or more before it takes effect.

What that means, is that the sooner you get the oil off your skin, the less likely you’ll have a bad reaction.

The very sensitive or risk-averse can carry a packet of "handywipes" designed to clean off oils, such as Kimberly-Clark's Professional Heavy-Duty Hand Cleaning Wipes.

When you get home, however, wash the effected area well with simple bar soap, water, and a wash cloth.

One trick is to coat the effected area with mineral oil or cooking oil (it will dilute the urushiol) and THEN soap up well to remove this more visible oil. If you’ve gotten the mineral or light vegetable oil off you, you’ve got the toxic urushiol off you as well!

A commercial product called Tecnu also sells itself as special outdoor skin cleanser that removes Poison Oak and Ivy Oils from your skin. The small bottles they sell at camping stores and pharmacies, however, are almost pure mineral oil... which you then have to wash off with bar soap. You might as well cut out the brand-name markup and use mineral oil or light cooking oil from the start.

When Lysol Was a Douche



A turpentine and coal tar disinfectant used in the U.K. as kennel wash, and as both external and internal medicine.

It’s still around as a disinfectant, but no longer touted as a medicine.

This is from the same era when, here in the US, Lysol was used as both douche and birth control; before there was a Food and Drug Administration or a Center for Disease Control.

Quack cures and marketing are still about. Send $50 to learn more!

The Extinction of Memory



Nothing is so evident of youth and inexperience as when someone claims they have “discovered” something older than dirt and perhaps less than perfect.

One example in the world of dogs is the food rewards crowd.

Food rewards dogs training is older than writing, and we have clear published instructions older than the Bible.

Great stuff, but perhaps not all there is to know?

Karen Pryor, the great maven of food and clickers kept her own border terrier in the yard with an Invisible Fence system, and could not walk her dog off-lead in forest or field.

Another example is the “raw” food folks who have just discovered that dogs will also eat frozen chicken, raw beef, cooked rice, and even vegetables.

Great stuff, but perhaps not all there is to know?

Is it a grand conspiracy that the American College of Veterinary Nutritionists (ACVN), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Veterinary Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the American Animal Hospital Association (AAHA), and the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) have all published cautions about feeding raw food to dogs? A grand conspiracy is it?

And kibble was invented because no one knew that you could feed a dog raw meat and vegetables?

It’s been said that the first thing to go extinct is memory.

Anything who thinks otherwise should talk to an anti-vaxxer or anyone old enough to remember when restaurants did not have heath inspectors.

If someone tells you aromatherapy can cure cancer, that water has memory, and that fire has no place in the kitchen, ask if these are ancient beliefs that were somehow found wanting.

If these same folks tell you prey drive can be stopped with cheese, ask them to bring an-off lead terrier to the edge of a highway, and you will supply the squirrel.

Is That An Alligator In Your Pocket?

Iterative Evolution in Birds and Irish Wolfhounds



The picture is a white-throated rail, a chicken-sized bird indigenous to Madagascar which, according to new research, went extinct many thousands of years ago but came back into existence due to a rare process called “iterative evolution”.

The research, from the University of Portsmouth and Natural History Museum, found that on two occasions, separated by tens of thousands of years, a rail from the main island flew to an isolated atoll called Aldabra and then became flightless. The second surviving colony of flightless rails is still found on the atoll.

What’s this have to do with wolfhounds?

Well, the modern breed is essentially a recreation as well — iterative evolution at the hand of man resulting in parallel structures from the same ancestors, but at different times.

And who recreated the Irish Wolfhound? A Scotsman living in England!