Thursday, September 17, 2026

Anwar and Jimmy Making History



This is Anwar Sadat and Jimmy Carter at Camp David. 

The only successful Middle East peace treaty was forged in Frederick County Maryland on September 17th of 1978.  

Menachen Begin and Anwar Sadat shared the 1978 Nobel Peace Prize for the Camp David Accords, but the achievement lef to Sadat’s assassination in October of 1981 by members of an Al-Qaeda linked group calling themselves the Egyptian Islamic Jihad.

Wednesday, September 16, 2026

Putting in 25 Wood Ferns


Nine holes dug, and Wood Ferns now in the ground at the base of 90 foot oaks.  11 more Wood Ferns to do tomorrow, and then nine others the next day.  The tree roots are less of a problem than the rocks.


Wild Animals Fear Humand


In the last week, I’ve written a bit about Limbic Imprinting, which occurs when baby (neonatal) animals, often only a day or two old, are taken away from their parents and love-bombed with food and attention by humans.  

The result is a permanent change in the animals Limbic System (aka, the paleo-mammalian brain cortex) which is involved in emotional processing and motivation in vertebrate animals. 

Limbic Imprinting is a physical thing, and it permanently changes the “fight or flight” part of the still-developing brain of a very young neonatal mammal or bird.

Limbic Imprinting is key to understanding why the “taming” of wild animals captured when only a few hours or days old, is so often successful.

It also explains why scientists who are breeding endangered species to return to the wild (California Condors, Black-footed Ferrets, Whooping Cranes, Red Wolves, etc.) are so careful to mask their human identities while caring for neonatals.

Limbic Imprinting (or the lack thereof) also explains why adult feral versions of “domesticated” animals are so difficult to work with despite descending from thousands of years of domestic stock.

As for wild animals, raised without close contact with humans, few things are more terrifying than humans.  As J.A. Baker writes in his book, “The Peregrine”:
“No pain, no death is more terrible to a wild creature that it's fear of man…. A poisoned crow, gaping and hopelessly floundering in the grass, bright yellow foam bubbling from its throat, will dash itself up again and again onto the descending wall of air, if you try to catch it. A rabbit, inflated and foul with myxomatosis... will feel the vibration of your footsteps and will look at you with bulging, sightless eyes….We are at the killers. We stink of death. We carry with us. It sticks to us like frost. We cannot tear it away.”

The Saiga Saga



Kazakhstan’s wolf population, once said to number 90,000 (years 2000-2005), has now fallen to 13,000 to 15,000.

Kazakhstan’s wolf population fell dramatically following a collapse in food sources, which led to hungry wolves predating on domestic stock, which led to the Kazakh government green-lighting culls of up to 15,000 wolves a year.

The main driver in the collapse of food resources for Kazakhstan wolves was the collapse of the Saiga Antelope population. 

As I noted in a 2007 post entitled “Dead Man’s Curve”:

“The Saiga is a kind of odd-looking Eurasian antelope that inhabits the open dry steppe grasslands and semi-arid deserts of Central Asia.

“In 1993 the total population of Saiga was estimated at over one million. By 2000, however, the Saiga population had decreased to less than 200,000, and by 2003 surveys indicated that less than 30,000 remained in the wild.

“This represents a population collapse of over 90% in a span of just 10 years.

“Ironically, the conservation community bears some responsibilty as a causal agent in the Saiga's rapid population decline, as Saiga horn was promoted by the World Wildlife Fund as a replacement for the Rhino horn sometimes prescribed by traditional Chinese apothecary shops.

“Increased pressure from apothecary suppliers in China resulted in rapid overhunting of the Saiga, and a population crash that appears to have pushed wild populations past the tipping point.

“Right now, there is a very real possibility that the Saiga may become extinct in the wild within the next decade.

“I tell this story as a cautionary tale about unintended consequences, hubris, and the speed of destruction in the modern world.

“The goal of the World Wildlife Fund was not to wipe out the Saiga -- it was to offer buffering protection to critically endangered Rhino populations while giving a nod to the demands of traditional Chinese apothecary shops. With more than a million Saiga running free in large herds in Central Asia, getting traditional medicine shops to use Saiga horn instead of Rhino horn seemed a reasonably safe and culturally-sensitive idea.

“The problem, of course, is that things are rarely as simple as they appear. With a population of over 1.2 billion people, the apothecary demands of China cannot be appeased by any animal in the wild -- an important point initially lost on the good people at the World Wildlife Fund.

“When an insatiable demand for wild animal horn was coupled with increased access to modern rifles, Central Asia experienced its own version of The Last Buffalo Hunt.

“I am reasonably certain the Saiga will eventually be brought back from the edge, just as the American Buffalo has been brought back from the abyss here in the United States.

“That said, a turnaround is going to be slow and expensive.

“The troubles of the Saiga are not entirely unique. In this country alone, we have stopped just short of wiping out the Condor, the Buffalo, the Black-footed Ferret, the Peregrine Falcon, the Manatee, the Red Wolf, and the American Crocodile.

“The developing world is poised to follow our path in all things. What remains unknown is whether they will employ the conservation brake in time to prevent their own wildlife treasures from tumbling into the abyss.

“A central problem is that in this modern world we can no longer afford to go slow. It took 2 million years to go from ‘Adam and Eve’ in the Olduvia Gorge to a human population of one billion people, but it took only 100 years to add the second billion people, 30 years to add the third, and 15 years to add the fourth. Today, the world's population is past six billion and is sure to climb past seven billion within the decade (note: it is now past 8.2 billion).

“Even as human population has soared, so too has technological progress. Muzzle loaders and iron sights have been replaced by spiral cut barrels and powerful optics. Hemp gill nets a hundred yards long have been replaced by nylon drift nets that can stretch for miles. The ax has given way to the chainsaw, and the chainsaw to the feller-buncher. The shovel and sledge hammer have given way to massive mechanical earthmovers and sequentially-fired dynamite relays. The backyard vegetable plot has given way to thousand-acre monoculture farms planted and and harvested by massive and complicated machines.

“Along with technological changes have come cultural and social changes as well. Limited local demands filled by well-known suppliers have fallen away to unlimited international demands and a global marketplace oblivious to the cause-and-effect ramifications of satisfying global needs.

“The bottom line is the bottom line, and nothing more.

“Chinese demand for horn means disappearing herds of antelope in Russia and Mongolia. Japanese demand for cheap plywood means disappearing forests in Indonesia and Malaysia. The need for catalogue paper in the U.S. means huge swaths of Canada's boreal forests are being cut to the ground to supply bright white copy. What we eat in the grocery store (including what we feed our dogs) may come from China, Chile, Australia, or Antarctica. The fibers we wear on our back may come from pesticide-soaked fields in Africa and may be sewn in sweat-shop factories in Asia.

“Out of sight is out of mind. We have no idea where things come from, or under what conditions.

“Where it will all end, no one knows, but it's clear that at the speed we are going, we are going to miss a few turns and end up in the ditch -- or worse -- a good percentage of the time.

“When that happens, it will not be an ‘accident,’ but a predictable consequence of our speeding down the highway, addled by too much population growth and turbo-boosted by technology.

“Yet, when the crack-up occurs, it is sure to be labeled an ‘accident’.  That's what they call every wreck at Dead Man's Curve.  Never mind the signs, full speed ahead!”

——— ▪️ ———

So was all that Saiga mortality due to Rhino Horn substitution alone, and are Saiga still nearly extinct in the wild?

No, and no.

Not all Saiga mortality was driven by demand from Chinese apothecaries. 

Between 2010 and 2017 there were mass Saiga die-offs linked to atypical wet weather and epizootic illnesses variously described as ruminal tympany, Pasteurellosis, and Hemorrhagic septicemia. 

The global Saiga population has has also bounced back at incredible speed, rising  from about 30,000 20 years ago to 2.8 to 4 million individuals today, with 90-95 percent of that population in Kazakhstan.  

This phenomenal rate of Saiga population growth (30 percent growth per year, year-on-year, and a doubling time of about 2.6 years) was made possible by the fact that two-thirds of Saiga females give birth to twins every year.  

What about the wolves?  

Kazakhstan reports that wolf population numbers have been slowly climbing in the last few years, but about 2,000 wolf predation permits a year are still being authorized, suggesting a near steady-state management plan is now in effect.



Tuesday, September 15, 2026

The Stolen Wolves of Kazakhstan



As I noted in an earlier post,

“Wild wolves are still being tamed every day.

“Why?

“Simple enough: for pets.

“The same trend is true for every other animal under the sun: coyotes, red fox, monkeys, apes, hyenas, tigers, lions, tapirs, sloths, crows, hawks, parrots, badgers, fenecs, servals, raccoons, cheetahs, bears, bobcats, rats, agoutis, possum, groundhogs... the list is endless. We routinely make pets of them all, in modern culture as well as primitive.”

In the first picture, we see a modern Kazak hunter who has raided a wolf den to steal away the cubs. These wolf cubs are then raised and later sold to dog fighters or killed for their skins.

How close can a Kazak dog be to a wolf? That obviously depends a lot on the particular dog, but take a look at the Kazak dog in the third picture (source >> https://sl1nk.com/nN3ycFQ ) and compare and contrast with the second image of a wolf-fighting dog.

Just two decades ago, Kazakhstan was said to have the largest wolf population in the world, with about 90,000 animals spread over about a million square miles. Since then, a government program of permitted culling has reduced the Kazakh wolf population to 13,000 to 15,000.



Wild Pets Are Older Than Domestic Animals





When I was a kid and living with my folks in North Africa, I would cruise through catalogues my father would order.

I think he got a lot of the references from Stewart Brand's Whole Earth News and The Last Whole Earth Catalogue, but I'm not sure.

In any case, I lived to flip through the catalogues of Carolina Biological Supply and Edmund Scientific, and one year we got a copy of the Stromberg company catalogue, which sold all kind of cool things from Squirrel Monkeys to Quail, and from Jagarundis to Ocelots.  

The 1972 Stromberg Catalogue has now been scanned in for everyone to see what I salivated over in my youth.

Wow.  Seriously?  You could buy black-footed ferrets through the mail??

It was all there for anyone to buy:  Live Woolly Monkeys, Skunks, Chimpanzees, Raccoons, Giant Anteaters, Black Bear cubs, Great Horned Owls, Basenjis, live Trout, Afghan Hounds, Black-footed Ferrets, Porcupines, Zebras, Red Fox, Peacocks, Chipmunks, Spider Monkeys, Beaver, Badger, and English Bulldogs too.

No, we never ordered anything.  There are no dead Squirrel Monkey or Giant Anteater stories in my house.  

As a kid in Africa I had a goat, a dog, 20 chickens, a hedgehog and a couple of rabbits, and for a while a chameleon and an African Gray Parrot as well.  I did not lack for wildlife, and spent a lot of time collecting beetles and butterflies, as well as slingshot-plinking at cats, chickens, and pigeons whenever I was not trapping birds.

But the Stromberg catalogue?  Damn!  That was the thing to spark the imagination of a 12-year old boy, wasn't it?

Now, of course, the internet has made catalogues redundant. Nearly any animal you want is a click away, and most can be sold legally and kept with permit and some legal restrictions, from Bobcat to African Lion, from Vulturine Guinea Fowl to Hyacinth Macaw, from Canadian Wolf to Sun Bear.

Missing the Essence of the Glass

All of them miss the essence of the glass, which is that it can be re-filled... and filled with anything. Even when "empty," it's full of possibilities and opportunities.

Nancy Sinatra :: These Boots Are Made for Walking

Peggy Lee :: Fever



Darwin’s Finches


 
ON THIS DAY IN 1835, a 26-year-old Charles Darwin, reached the Galápagos Islands on board the HMS Beagle.
 
A bit of trivia:  the finches of the Galápagos Islands are not mentioned at all in On the Origin of Species, and Darwin had no idea from which island the various species and subspecies of finch had been collected. 

The story of Darwin's finches is mostly credited to their popularization by ornithologist David Lack in his book Darwin's Finches, published in 1947.

Monday, September 14, 2026

Odds of Pathogen Exposure From Dog Food


▪️Research cited by Cornell University’s Riney Canine Health Center indicates that “your odds of being exposed to a foodborne pathogen (Salmonella, Listeria, or toxigenic E. coli) in frozen raw meat diets for pets purchased online are about 1-out-of-3.”

See >> https://www.vet.cornell.edu/departments-centers-and-institutes/riney-canine-health-center/canine-health-topics/raw-foods-dogs-evidence-based-advice-riney-canine-health-center

▪️In contrast, dry processed pet foods show a significantly lower Salmonella prevalence of just 0.42%, according to studies like Nemser et al. (2014).

See >> https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11605167/

The Species That Never Existed


Back in 2005
, I wrote a piece called “Thinking About Species Loss” in which I suggested than when we talked about some “extinct” species, we might entertain the idea that the species never existed all.
“As odd as it may sound, even physical evidence of the existence of a species does not necessarily mean that this species has ever existed. Here, I am specifically talking about birds, where it turns out some ‘extinct’ species are based on single skins collected in the 19th or early 20th Century…. 
“The problem with birds is that they hybridize a lot, and bird species are not always very distinct from each other... [F]or example, there are several species of hummingbirds that we know of only due to single examples collected for the millenary trade. These so-called ‘Bogotá Skins’ (for their central shipping point out of South America to Europe) may in fact represent evidence of a new species of now extinct hummingbirds -- or they could simply represent hybrids of other hummingbirds. With about 10 percent of all bird species known to cross the ‘species barrier,’ it's hard to know.”

Now, it appears
there is at least one clear example of what I suspected:

“Working from the skin Townsend collected in 1833, Parkes concluded in 1985 that Townsend's Bunting was not a distinct species at all.


“His theory: the bird was an aberrant Dickcissel, an individual missing the normal carotenoid pigment that would otherwise have produced the species' usual yellow-breasted, chestnut-shouldered look.”

CSN :: Almost Cut My Hair

Bart the Bear Was Born in Baltimore



Yes, Bart the Bear — made famous in the Grizzly Adams TV series and over 15 movies and 15 documentaries — was an Alaskan Brown Bear born at the Baltimore Zoo in 1977.

Bart was the product of an unplanned pregnancy and the zoo allegedly lacked the facilities to care for the cub, and so it was sold at 5 pounds and 5 weeks old to Hollywood animal trainers Doug and Lynne Seus.

Why do I say “allegedly”?

Well, the story of zoo births and money is not a particularly attractive tale. As I noted back in 2009:

“Canned big game shoots of exotic animals are a natural outgrowth of the public's fascination with ‘zoo babies’.

“Zoos routinely over-breed animals because tiger cubs and baby zebras boost attendance and generate profits. Cute baby animals quickly grow up, however, and that's a problem. It turns out that the world has more caged lions, tigers and zebras than it knows what to do with.

“What to do? Answer: canned shooting preserves in Texas. It's not an accident that at one point nine board members of the San Antonio Zoo owned hunt preserves.

“Not all exotic animals used in canned hunts come from large zoos. Many come from small zoos and private breeders of large exotic animals. If you have a checkbook in this country, you can buy anything from a lion to a bear, and from a bobcat to a gemsbok.

“And if you have ever bought a wildife magazine with amazing shots of baby cougars, lynx, red fox, black bear and wolf, you are a small part of the problem. Most of those pictures were taken in private ‘photography zoos,’ and at least some of those baby animals were later sold, as adults, to canned hunts.

“An example is as current as this morning's headlines:

"’Country music star Troy Lee Gentry (one half of popular duo Montgomery Gentry) is facing charges for shooting a tame, captive bear and then trying to mask the killing as a proper hunt.... Indictment documents made public this week showed that Gentry paid $4,650 U.S. to kill a 'trophy-caliber' bear named Cubby. The incident took place two years ago at the Minnesota Wildlife Connection, a company that claims to offer photographers a chance to capture wild animals on film. ... Gentry killed the bear using a bow and arrow while the animal was in its pen.’”

So what were the real circumstances surrounding Bart’s birth?  I have no idea, but an “unplanned pregnancy” of a Kodiak Bear who is quickly sold strikes me as slightly suspicious.

That said, Bart had a glorious, well-loved, and long life, and he did wonders for bear conservation.

But was it an accident that Bart was sold just as he first opened his eyes?

No, of course not. That’s exactly when you snatch a wild animal away from its mother if you are looking to shape the animal by leveraging Limbic Imprinting.

Short Skirt, Long Jacket, Emma Peale Edition



A Song of My People


I was born a Cesarean section in what was then Salisbury, Rhodesia and is now Harare, Zimbabwe. 

Due to the circumstances of my birth, my father gave me "Corrigan" as a middle name in honor of "Wrong Way Corrigan,” the fellow who flipped off the FAA to fly solo, and without permission, from Brooklyn to Ireland in 1938. 

More people attended Douglas Corrigan’s Broadway ticker-tape parade than honored Lindbergh after his 1927 triumph. 

I like the Corrigan-name zinger quite a lot, as my life has had both a theme and a plot right from the beginning.

Well, imagine my delight to find this song by the Corrigan Brothers this evening.  

Apparently it’s very popular song in Ireland (especially this week!) as are both Barrack Obama and Joe Biden.

Imagine!

Oddly, my mother grew up 6 and a half blocks from Madelyn Lee Payne, Barack Obama's grandmother, in the little town of Augusta, Kansas. 

It was Madelyn Lee Payne who raised Barack from the age of 10 onward.

The 1935 census says my Grandfather, Robert E. Dunlop, was the "still man" at the local refinery in Augusta, and he was making $496 a month. 

Rolla Payne, Madelyn Payne's father, is listed as a "bookkeeper for an oil company" --  no doubt the same refinery as the one where my grandfather worked. 

Augusta, Kansas was an oil company refinery town.  The Payne's lived only six and half blocks from my mother and my grandparents. 

Like my grandparents, the Paynes were Methodists.  Being devout, they no doubt attended the only Methodist church in town along with my grandmother (my grandfather was not much for church attendance).

My mother died four years ago, in the Washington, D.C. house she’d lived in with my father for 49 years.  

Oddly, her house was just 6 and a half blocks away from Barrack Obama’s. ❤️

Two Local Longhorns

L





 
They were tucked into each other to avoid flies, and the one never turned towards me. Huge animals, but apparently quite calm and docile. These are “front of the farm” cows and are more or less pets.

Sunday, September 13, 2026

The Color Palette of Robots



The world is ruled by opportunistic social pack predators.  

I mention this because I am seeing a lot of apparently unrelated things that may suggest a pattern leading to — what?  

I don’t know.  

That said, I can see a picture forming, and it’s not an AI-created picture, even if it’s a painting of the immediate future of Artificial Intelligence.

The first color on the palette is that Anthropic and OpenAI seem to be delaying their IPO, or Initial Public Offering.

The background here is that AI companies burn through cash like runaway trains burning through coal bunkers.  

Revenue cannot keep up. 

That’s normal for a startup business or industry, but the rate and scale of the AI cash-burn is truly unprecedented, and the price to earnings ratios in these new tech industries often makes no sense.

What seems incontestable is that OpenAI and Anthropic **need** an IPO to raise cash, but only if the IPO valuation is very high. 

Will it be? 

Who knows, but the SpaceX IPO proved wildly volatile, losing as much as 50 percent of its highest valuation at one point. 

SpaceX owns xAI, so to some (muddy) extent, the first AI IPO has already occurred.

But the SpaceX IPO was a muddy thing on several levels. 

Anthropic and OpenAI promise a cleaner presentation and valuation, at least in theory.

Anthropic wants to IPO before OpenAI, but they seem to be edging back. Are they confidant of their proposed valuation?  If so, why?  If not, why not?

OpenAI and Anthropic **need** an IPO to raise cash, but they may also **fear** it as well.  

That’s the itch.  

How to scratch it?

One way may be to create an alternative reason to **delay** an IPO without triggering a financing panic.

To do that, they need a non-finance reason to SLOW everything down.

Which brings me to the second color on the palette; the current firestorm of Doomsday predictions about AI.  

These seem a little too “manufactured all at once” for me.  

Could there be another agenda — a look for a reason to slow growth and delay what might be a problematic IPO for either Anthropic or OpenAI?

I don’t know, but it’s not outside the bounds of logic is it?

Pair that with the massive groundswell of local opposition, at a national level, to data centers, and the government’s sudden shut down of two Anthropic modules, and the risk of regulatory capture enters the arena.  

It’s a pair of potentially big monsters.  Those are the third colors on the palette.

Which brings me to the fourth color on the palette, the nascent suggestion that government may need to be a major owner of AI.

This is a trial balloon being floated from both the right and the left, and by both the technologically illiterate and the very top of the AI pyramids.

One rationale for the government to be a very large stock-owner of AI companies is that putative future “profits” could be used to defray the cost of supporting scores of millions of now unemployed (thanks to AI) workers.

What’s unclear is whether the push here is for benevolent communism (ie the government seizing and nationalizing the means of production in order to fund a social-welfare state) or something else — a massive economic bailout with government buying several hundred billion dollars of AI stock to prevent an AI melt-down. 

So those are the fours colors I see on the palette.  The CYMK of it all.

But what’s being painted?  

I have no idea.  I do know, however, that it’s human hands that are painting it.

Finding Use for the Dead


 Three loads of cut-to-size fire wood, free to my neighbor.  Two of oak, and also this one of now (mostly) dry pine.

Born Free and Limbic Imprinting



How many of us saw the movie “Born Free” in a movie theater?  If you did, you’re past 60!

Born Free is the story of Elsa the lioness and her two siblings, who were orphaned at a few days old and scooped out of the Kenyan wild by George and Joy Adamson in 1956.

The book is the book, and the movie is the movie, but suffice it to say that what was going in here was already long understood by wild animal trainers, even if it was not named and was novel to the general public.

Limbic Imprinting With Siefried & Roy



These tiger cubs are just days old, their eyes not yet completely working, but they have already been permanently removed from their mothers. 

These cubs will be bottle-fed by hand for the next three months and bottle treats will be used repeatedly as young adults — part of the Limbic Imprinting protocol used by Siegfried & Roy and many other large animal trainers.

Limbic Imprinting is the third type of imprinting — the one beyond the Filial Imprinting described by Konrad Lorenz, or the Sexual Imprinting that determines what or who animals see as potential mates.  

Limbic Imprinting effects the still-forming chemistry of the amygdala in the neo-natal brain of mammals, and it impacts emotion and the body's fight-or-flight response.  

One reason adult wild animals are so anxious around humans is that their Limbic system is wired to trigger fight-or-flight.  

One reason wild animal trainers are so focused on getting their future charges as neonatal dependents, preferably only a few days old, is that successful Limbic Imprinting at this very early age seems to permanently rewire the fight-or-flight response.

In the case of Siegfried & Roy and their big cats, everything was all fine until it wasn’t.  

Wild animals can be reliably tamed if taken at a very early age and “love bombed” with treats and training, but some instincts are baked in, which means they will always present regardless of training (see “The Misbehavior of Organisms” by Keller and Marian Breland, 1961).  

Mostly these instinctive behaviors are marking, vocalization, foraging, or bedding behaviors, but prey drive (especially chasing) is certainly one, and all animals have the ability to get angry, defensive, or irritated. 

In the case of Siegfried & Roy, it’s not clear what happened, but the end result was Roy Horn was mauled by the neck and his spine broken, resulting in an end to the highest paid act on Las Vegas’s Sunset Strip.

Or, to quote Chris Rock about the limits and realities of wild animal training, “That tiger went tiger!”

The Hyena Men of Nigeria



Yesterday, in a post entitled “Nature or Nurture,” I explained Limbic Imprinting, and why the capture of wild animals very soon after they are born is key to much successful taming.

Here, we see how an extended family group in Nigeria has turned the capturing and display of infant Hyenas and Baboons (often after killing their parents) into their family business.

You may not realize it, but you have seen the exact same thing in the more elaborate acts of Siegfried and Roy and other wild animal entertainers.  

The practice of snatching very young babies in order to forge Limbic Imprinting has been repeated again and again for millennia, from wolves, lions, and bears, to deer,  chimpanzees, and elephants.

Put the Champagne On Ice




This is Donald Trump falling asleep at yesterday’s 9-11 ceremony at the Pentagon in Washington, D.C.

He was dead asleep with pronounced facial asymmetry and odd facial movements. There’s lots of video and 100s of shots.  This public sleeping on stage — and manic late night angry tweeting of confused babble — has been going on for months.

This is classic Alzheimers behavior paired with incipient signs of a stroke.  

Facial asymmetry that happens very fast, within seconds to minutes, where one side of the face droops, the smile looks uneven, and the person cannot control one side of their mouth, are classic stroke signs of a stroke, as is loss of balance, arm weakness, slurred speech, confusion, and outbursts of anger.

Trump is now in the Devil’s Waiting Room, and I do not think the queue is long.



The Fence

Habitat without wildlife is scenery.
Wildlife without habitat is a zoo.

Today’s Yard Work Supervisor



Saturday, September 12, 2026

Nature or Nurture?



Domesticated or wild? Tame or feral?


It’s not quite that simple is it?


Yes, if you are painting broadly, wolves as a group are “wild,” and one on a leash can be described as “tame”.


Conversely, dogs as a group are “domesticated,” but an adult dog that was born in a dump far from humans, eats roadkill, and has never seen the inside of a building or worn a collar on its neck can be described as “feral”.


But things fall apart and come together if we look a bit closer.


Take a truly feral adult dog or cat.  


Can they be rehabilitated?  


It depends on the animal, but it’s *always* difficult, as truly feral adult cats and dogs are as fearful of people as a naturally wild animal. 


Why is that?  


Well, it seems the process of “going feral” in dogs and cats fundamentally changes how their brain and central nervous systems deal with novelty.


Anxiety is almost always on the front burner.  


These genetically “domesticated” dogs and cats have been effectively “wired for wild”.


Where and when does this wiring occur?


It occurs in the Limbic System of the brain, and it occurs in the first few days and weeks after birth.


What’s the Limbic System?


The Limbic System is the part of an individual animal’s brain that controls “flight or fight,” emotion, fear, and mood.


An individual animal’s Limbic System is wired and rewired starting at birth and over the next few weeks.


Changes in the Limbic System are, as far as we can tell, one-way events. 


What’s that mean?  It means that if a domesticated animal, such as a dog or cat, is born and raised to adulthood without human contact, it’s always going to be wild, and its “flight or fight” button will govern a great deal of its life.


Conversely, if a wild animal, such as a wolf or big cat, is born and raised to adulthood with lots of positive human contact, its “flight or fight” button will be attenuated due to changes made to the Limbic System shortly after birth


What about domesticated dogs that are born with genetic fear?  


There’s a topic that too often gets little attention!


Dogs born with genetic fear may have been well-cared for through their first 12 weeks of life, but they remain anxious and hand-shy nonetheless.  These animals are, in the words of Lady Gaga “born that way”.  


Can they be “fixed”?  


Not easily.  


A dog with genetic fear is a dog with a broken Limbic System. People are free to do what they want, but in my opinion a dog with genetic fear needs to be put down as humanely as possible, as the defect is in the brain, and makes them maladaptive as a pet.


Now, let’s flip it around and look at it the other way.   What about wild animals that are captured when only a few days old?


Here things go in the opposite direction Several things are happening in this situation,  especially with animals whose eyes are not yet open.


Imprinting, socialization, and rewards-based training all work together in this scenario to “tame” the natural fear of humans that pervades most wild animals.


This is Limbic Imprinting.


Limbic Imprinting begins with Filial Imprinting, in which baby animals naturally follow the first moving thing they see.  When that instinctive behavior is rewarded with food, warmth. and positive contact, the imprinting that occurs is likely permanent, and certainly difficult to change. 


Why is it so hard to change?  


That’s because an animal’s neonatal experience wires, or rewires, the  brain’s Limbic System (aka, the paleo-mammalian cortex) which is involved in emotional processing and motivation in vertebrate animals. 


Limbic Imprinting is a physical thing, and it’s key to understanding why the “taming” of wild animals captured when only a few hours or days old, is so often successful. 


Limbic Imprinting also explains why adult feral versions of “domesticated” animals are so difficult to work with despite descending from thousands of years of domestic stock.


Can “wild” animals taken at birth be tamed to the point of being far safer and more tractable than adult “domesticated” animals allowed to go fully feral?


Absolutely. We can see that in every country, every culture, in every era, and with damn near every animal, from elephants to lions, from chimpanzees to cheetahs, from horses to buffalo, from camels to red fox, and from badger to wolves. 


Some wild animals seem to tame rather easily, such as camels, horses, water buffalos, yaks, ducks, geese, hamsters, pigs, wild cats, and junglefowl.


These same animals, of course, have no trouble going feral.


Are they domesticated animals going feral, or wild animals made tame?


Does it matter?  


It’s really a tautological word game isn’t it?  Six of one and half a dozen of the other, as the old saying goes.


To be clear, imprinting and training *alone* will not make a wolf a bird dog or a good family pet.  


Even if a “wild” animal is always friendly and safe, there will be other issues that remain; size, urine marking, denning behavior, food caching, and the like. And, in the case of coyotes, foxes, and wolves, their body movements and play behavior may not be dog-like.


But can a wolf stolen from the den at two days old be turned into an animal that is safer than a three year old poorly socialized and truly feral 120-pound dog?


Absolutely.


And so now we get down to it: “domesticated” does not mean much,


Despite being domesticated for over 15,000 years, pet dogs routinely kill sheep and goats, kill other dogs, and maul and kill people.


And what about cattle and horses?  They’ve been domesticated for millennia, but woe be the fool that crosses the wire into a bull pasture.  


If you go to Pamplona and find yourself running with four feet of horn and two thousand pounds of muscle bearing down on you, be sure to yell backwards, “But you’re domesticated!”  I’m sure that will work wonders.


By the way, a truly feral dog is NOT the same as a stray or a village dog.  Strays and village dogs generally have had quite a lot of experience with humans, early on, and these animals see people as potential sources for food handouts.  A truly feral dog does not.


——————


RELATED POSTS:


▪️Konrad Lorenz Did Not Discover Imprinting >> https://terriermandotcom.blogspot.com/2025/11/konrad-lorenz-did-not-discover.html?

▪️The Wolf In the Dog House >> https://terriermandotcom.blogspot.com/2012/01/distinctions-without-difference.html?

▪️The Stolen Wolves of Kazakhstan >> https://terriermandotcom.blogspot.com/2016/11/the-stolen-wolves-of-kazakhstan.html?

▪️ Who Domesticated Whom? And Why? >> https://terriermandotcom.blogspot.com/2011/09/who-domesticated-whom-and-why.html?

▪️ The Wolves of Tbilisi Street >> https://terriermandotcom.blogspot.com/2014/04/the-wolves-of-tbilisi-street.html?