Protect Our Wild Animals, has been monitoring the Warwickshire and the Heythrop hunts from a gyrocopter over the past three weeks. Masters of the hunt told The Times that one of the low-flying aircraft had been reported to the Civil Aviation Authority and the police about ten days ago, amid fears that it was upsetting animals. It was said to have been swooping in an aggressive manner over the hunt.
In the United States, inteference with hunting is a crime and is prosecutable. It seems to me that's a law the British need to embrace.
.
2 comments:
Regarding all of your comments about animal rights activists as "lunatics," you know, that is your own personal opinion and not a fact. I happen to love terriers and own several of them, but I also love all animals and am against hunting (unless necessary), trapping, and all methods of cruelty against animals. Just because you love hunting doesn't mean that you have to hurl insults at a group of mostly well-meaning people. But I don't expect you to comprehend this because you're stuck in your narrow-minded vision.
Let's see, these two people just DECAPITATED a man with an autogyro, and that's the best you have?
I do not know if you are a lunatic or not, but you are certainly stupid!
The fact that people are "well-meaning" is hardly the point, is it? Hitler was well-meaning (and a vegetarian). He genuinely thought he was helping. So do most serial killers who are only "following the voices." In fact, I think it is rather hard to find an evil person who thinks he is evil. They are almost all "well-meaning." But you never thought of that, right? Stupid!
No one is asking you to hunt. No one! But how is it, if I might ask, that you think wild animals die? It is not on a morphine drip with gentle waltz music in the background. It is vehicle impact. It is by starvation. It is disease leaving them broken in a ditch.
In life, there is only one good death, and it is swift and unexpected. Hunting provides that. You did not think of that, did you? No. Stupid!
Your seem to equate not being cruel with Animal Rights, but if so then you are ignorant. Hunting is not torture and neither is trapping -- it is swift death. But I doubt you have actually seen a Conibear in action, or even know what one is. You have probably never even been in a Medicaid nursing home to watch the human elderly die with bedsores, soaked in their own urine, and moaning from cancer. Too much reality. Life must be all sweetness, light, and romance novels!
And yet, your whole life is wrapped around the use of animals. You were vaccinated as a child with vaccines developed and tested on animals. The makeup you wear (apparently quite a lot of, if that picture is you) was tested on an animal sometime somewhere (and I assure you that is the case, as the formula was not invented at that vegan boutique you frequent). When you get old and need heart work like Mrs. Bush just did, they will slice you open (surgical skills learned on animals) and place a pig valve in your heart to make you live a longer and happier life. The antibiotics you depend on to live were probably grown out on animal tissue or broth, and they were certainly tested on live animals. Everyone in your family -- including you -- is alive because of the medical research opposed by Animal Rights lunatics. Did you ever think of that? No, of course not. Stupid!
You bravely stand up to say you are against hunting -- "unless necessary." What does that mean? You mean you are against hunting unless there are so many deer thay they are killing lots of humans through vehicle impact, and costing people their gardens and farmers their crops? Why do you think deer are hunted? Seriously, why don't you study a little population dynamics? For example, right about now there are 500,000 red fox in the state of Virginia and in late December, there will be 250,000. What will happen to the others? How did those animals die? Not by trapping! Not by bullet! No, their death will be much more cruel than that. And that is the death you support because it is "natural."
But of course, humans hunting wild animals is not "natural" in your world, is it? No, in your world the mall is natural, but hunting is not. Think that through a little. Do you see the stupidity peeping through?
If you REALLY want to help animals and the planet, get your tubes tied. Seriously. I had a vasectomy and adopted. Why don't you do the female equivalent of the same? You want to help animals and be less cruel and be a "cutting edge" vegan? Go for it -- go under the knife. Put your ovaries where your philosophy is. Or would that mean that the world would be denied your precious DNA and superiour genetics? Please God, don't tell me you are vain as well as stupid!
PBurns
Post a Comment