Sunday, January 13, 2008

A Sermon is Needed on Hillary's History Lesson



Hillary tells Fox News reporter Major Garrett that Martin Luther King was not as important as LBJ.



Hillary's arrogance is amazing
. In New Hampshire, she cried because she said the nation would inevitably "fall backward" if we were too stupid to realize she was the only one that could lead us forward.

Only Hillary could see "what was happening." Only Hillary could save us. And sadly, it looked like we were all going to be too stupid to see that.

Boo hoo!

Now Hillary has the temerity to tell us that Lyndon Johnson was more important than Martin Luther King.

And remember the subtext here.

The important part here is not that LBJ was a MAN; the important thing here is that he was WHITE.

To which I can only say: Gosh, Hillary, thanks for the lesson!

It's good to get this information just before the South Carolina primary (January 19th), which happens to occur just two days before Martin Luther King Day.

Here's hoping the Black churches in South Carolina give a sermon on Hillary's history lesson.

It's important for folks to understand what (and who) is really important. Not Martin Luther King, Rosa Parks, Malcolm X, Thurgood Marshall or Medger Evers. No, no. What was important was the white guy -- LBJ.

And, according to Hillary, the thing that is important and what can change a nation is not a message of hope, or the calling of all Americans to a higher purpose.

What's important is not vision or message.

What's important is that the person at the top be a seasoned Black Belt in the mean-spirited politics of Washington.

Barack Obama may have inherited Martin Luther King's great American dream, but Hillary want us to know she inherited LBJ's mean-spirited schemes.

Above all else, Hillary wants to remind us that she is white. She could be President.

Obama is black. He never could be.

It would be a crying shame if you and everyone else missed this all-important point.

Gender? Not an issue!

Race? Very big issue!

Any questions? No? Excellent!

.

3 comments:

BorderWars said...

LBJ, wasn't that the guy who got rich on Vietnam from kickbacks from his arms dealer friends in Texas, rigged elections, and ostensibly is the only one who benefited from the Kennedy Assassination (can we say means, motive, opportunity?)?

I love how the media has pegged Nixon as the corrupt President despite cover ups hardly going out of style. Johnson wasn't only a crook, was a traitor to this nation and an evil man.

As for race and racism... I won't touch that with a 10 foot pole. White men of means aren't allowed to speak about race, unless they're pandering to people of color without means.

Anonymous said...

The Clinton machine has gained quite the reputation for being the next best thing to the Russian Mob in terms of the way they run their campaign.

What I cannot fathom is how some Democrats would be so stampedingly eager to replace one power-hungry, secretive, authoritarian administration with another. I'm no Obama fan (irreconcilable politics), but I just disagree with him. When Hillary dies, I worry that someone will forget the stake in the heart.

Anonymous said...

Well all I can say is that I did not hear what you guys heard. What I heard is that it takes someone to stand up against what is wrong and it takes someone who has more "political power" to push it through Congress whether or not they thoroughly believe it but see it as a necessity.
Nothing to do with who is black white male or female. And of course if most of us were not somewhat racist or sexist this would never be an issue at all.