A very nice piece from Tim Bonner at the Countryside Alliance:
For those of a certain age and students of sporting literature the term sportsman-naturalist will be very familiar. The great ‘BB’, Denys Watkins-Pitchford, was a perfect example and even wrote a book called ‘Ramblings of a Sportsman-Naturalist’. Sir Peter Scott: artist, wildfowler and founder of the Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust and World Wildlife Fund (WWF), was perhaps the pinnacle of the type and he was also critical in the creation of the conservation movement which has largely enveloped the concept of a ‘naturalist’.
There is perhaps just one great figure left from that era of the sportsman-naturalist and this week he announced his retirement from public life. When Peter Scott created the WWF in 1961 it was to Prince Philip he turned to be its first President and critical figure in developing the international reputation of the WWF. The Prince has never been anything but forthright about his love of shooting and remains patron of the Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust which wonderfully embodies that 20th century concept of the sportsman-naturalist for the modern world.
Even in retirement Prince Philip will continue to provide the link between the ages and a reminder to all that activities like shooting, hunting and fishing, and conservation are inseparable. In recent times we have far too often seen some ‘conservationists’ and sporting interests in opposition when all the evidence is that together they are the most important barriers to the constant challenges that the natural world faces from human development. Prince Philip may be the last of the sportsman-naturalists, but he was also one of the first conservationists. The lesson of his life should surely be that we are all conservationists, whether sportsmen or not, and that differences between conservationists must never be allowed to thwart the cause of conservation.
I do think U.K. has a serious conservation-naturalist problem.
Where on the entire World Wide Web is their a site on hunting with dogs that makes a sustained, deep, and serious pitch for conservation?
It's not there in the U.K. world of terriers and hounds, so far as I can tell.
And for that reason alone, I suspect, hunting with dogs has less public support than it otherwise might across the pond
Habitat without wildlife is scenery, and wildlife without habitat is a zoo.
For wildlife and habitat to thrive, they both need a vocal, educated, and passionate constituency.
The world of dominance hunters makes for a very poor presentation to the public, while food hunters are generally too down-scale to hold much social influence. That means conservation hunter-naturalists are often key to shaping and framing how the public sees and understand the role of people, farms, and foresters, and the wildlife and wild lands they intersect.
The last sportsman-naturalist? God forbid!