Tuesday, September 01, 2009

Crying Wolf in Dog and Hunting Debates



Starting today, gray wolf hunting tags will be sold in the lower 48 for the first time in decades.

How did that happen?

Simple: Wolves are breeding very fast in some Rocky Mountain states, and the Obama administration's Fish and Wildlife Service removed wolves from the endangered species list back in March.

What?

The Obama Administration?

I thought they were owned and operated by PeTA and the Humane Society of the U.S.?

Right. And if you believed that, there is probably no helping you. You are what we refer to here in Washington as "gullible."

Of course, there's no shortage of folks who are gullible.

Just ask John Yates of the "American Sporting Dog Alliance."

Just before the November election, Yates sent out a barn burner of an email in which he wrote that any and every dog owner should vote for John McCain and Sarah Palin. He predicted nothing less than an apocalypse for dogs if we did not march to his drum beat.

"We are convinced that animal ownership is doomed if Obama becomes our next president."


We?

Who is "we?"

Hard to know. From what I can tell Mr. Yates, who runs a small commercial kennel in Pennsylvania, created this organization whole-cloth, and put himself in as its head.

No matter; it's still a free country, and people can refer to themselves in the first person plural if they want to.

That said, there is a certain lack of sophistication to Mr. Yates' political analysis. He writes:

The American Sporting Dog Alliance is opposed to Obama’s candidacy because of his close relationship with the Humane Society of the United States and his political alliances with several key animal rights movement supporters in Congress. We also think he has been dishonest about his views regarding hunting and firearms, and these are issues of major importance to many of our members.


Right. "Our members." Lots of them. Last I looked, Obama won in a landslide.

At the time this kind of stuff was being posted to canine list-servs across the country, I quietly pointed out why it was wrong. See here and here and here and here and here and here.

The good news, is that you no longer have to take my word for it. If President Obama is a dog-hating, anti-Second Amendment, PeTA water boy, he sure is a strange one:



I could go on, but what's the point? The Black Helicopter crowd is not going to be swayed by actual facts.

And no, they are also not going to stop over-hyping every twist and turn in the world of dogs. Right now John Yates is telling us:

  • California dogs face disaster ... with economic ‘Armageddon’ just around the corner.

  • New York dogs face mass murder.

  • All Ohio kennels in danger now


Right. All I can say is "don't believe the hype."

And here's the rub: I am not faulting Yates for his intent. I am faulting him for his tactics.

I have written pretty harshly about PETA (see here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here).

I am no friend of the Humane Society of the U.S. (see here and here and here and here and here and here and here).

I am opposed to mandatory spay neuter and to tail-docking restrictions and I think freedom should ring in both arenas.

I hunt with dogs all year long, and not for potted birds.

But I am not a hysteric.

Most people know if I give warning, it is for a reason, and that I have probably done by homework.

The American Sporting Dog Alliance? Not so much. Just look at their track record to know why.

And yet Yates seems clueless. He writes:

The American Sporting Dog Alliance has contacted the Obama Transition Team and offered our services to the incoming Administration. We have specifically requested to participate in the selection process for key officials in the U.S. Departments of Agriculture and the Interior, and also to serve on a proposed animal issues advisory board. We do not know if our request will be accepted or rejected, but we strongly believe that the President-elect needs to hear the concerns of dog ownership advocates.


Yates has "offered his services" to the Obama transition team? Sorry, but the Obama Administration actually knows people who hunt with dogs, can fact check, and who have the bests interests of dogs, dog owners, and the Obama Administration at heart.

John Yates and the "American Sporting Dog Alliance" do not quite fit that bill, do they?

But so what? Yates has the right to free speech. Surely he is doing no harm?

Yes, absolutely; he has the right to free speech.

But speech can harm.

That, in fact, is the lesson of the "Boy Who Cried Wolf."

You remember the story: The little shepherd boy who was having a jolly time screaming "Oh My God, there's a WOLF" at every turn. He got everyone panicked, and he got a lot of attention.

The first dozen times, everyone thanked him profusely for the warning. "My God," they said "suppose we had not known?"

Only one problem. Somewhere around the 200th chain-pull, folks began to realize there was no wolf.

The kid was a crackpot, an attention-whore, a child playing games.

And so, people stopped paying attention.

And what happened when a wolf did show up? The wolf ate all the sheep, and a few townspeople too.

And that's the problem with hype, hysteria, and unbridled fear mongering.

Once you have turned the volume up to "10" you have nowhere else to go.

And once you have said "animal ownership is doomed if Obama becomes our next president" and then Obama gets a dog, you really do become a laughing stock.



.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Obama's "gonna take our guns."

Actually, he's gonna let you take your gun into a national park. He's actually expanding the second amendment's reach. The Democrats won't touch gun control with a 1,000 foot pole, and still the paranoids prattle on.

Now for this wolf thing. A long shot candidate for the Idaho governorship, Rex Rammell, is not only an anti-Obama paranoid. He is an anti-wolf paranoid.

When Idaho began offering wolf tags, this is what Dr. Rammell (who is a veterinarian) said: http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/08/obama_hunting_tags_rammell_sticks_by_joke.php

Rammell is in with the anti-wolf loons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nSs4lpZPQ6Q

This guy is a great "biologist." You can't count the things he gets wrong. "If the devil had an animal, it would be the Canadian [sic] wolf." The conspiracy theory goes that the wolves of Idaho are from a different subspecies than the one that existed there before. It's nonsense, of course.

Then he goes onto extol Rex Rammell for the US Senate. Rammell didn't win, of course, because he's too out there for Idaho.

Now, what worries me about this wolf proposal from Obama administration is that Idaho has a lot of remote territory and lots of people with this mindset.

Anonymous said...

Rammell is running on an interesting platform-- let's run elk ranches under the same regulatory mechanism as cattle ranches!

http://rexrammell.com/about.aspx

Of course, never mind that there are wild herds of elk in Idaho, which can get all sort of diseases from domestic ones. Never mind that farmed elk are often crossed with red deer, and if these animals escape, they will pollute the genetics of wild elk.

And Rammell got the law changed.

But I'm sure if the elk started dying of a disease caused by domestic elk ranches, the wolves and Obama would be blamed for it.