Information on working terriers, dogs, natural history, hunting, and the environment, with occasional political commentary as I see fit. This web log is associated with the Terrierman.com web site.
Friday, September 19, 2008
If You Subsidize Stupid, You Get More of It
If you subsidize stupidity and inefficiency, you get more of it.
This is Economics 101, but it's new information to politicians on both sides of the aisle who are toying around with the idea of giving Detroit a $50 billion "loan" in order to encourage them to make more fuel-efficient cars.
At first blush, the idea might seem to have merit until you realize Ford, General Motors and Chrysler are already making and selling these car in Europe.
But wait. It get better. It turns out that these same companies used to make more fuel-efficient cars in this country.
In 1992, American car buyers had the choice of 33 new car models that had a combined city and highway EPA rating of at least 30 miles per gallon.
For the current model year, there are just 12.
In 1992, a two-wheel-drive Ford Explorer had better fuel efficiency -- 17 mpg -- than the same model in 2008, which gets 16.
General Motors currently doesn't have ANY cars that top 30 mpg combined.
The good news, is that General Motors intends to change that by introducing the "Cruze."
And when will this car arrive? Not until 2011!
And how many miles per gallon will it get? Just 45 mpg on the highway -- about 13 mpg LESS than a fuel-efficient Geo Metro made 14 years ago.
And what will General Motors spend to achieve this "progress"?
Over $500 million.
Unbelievable.
Welcome to Detroit today.
And let's be clear: the problem is not with American workers; it's with American management.
That is the stupid we are subsidizing.
.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Part of the decline in mpg ratings is attributable to a new standard which employs more realistic testing conditions (e.g., higher speeds, harder acceleration, air conditioning on). See http://www.cartalk.com/content/columns/Archive/2008/August/07.html for details. But I suspect that the new standard doesn't fully explain the decline. I used to drive a Honda CRX HF 2-seater that was rated for (if memory serves) 50 mpg city, 58 mpg highway. My actual mileage occasionally exceeded that, due in part to driving techniques of questionable safety like drafting close behind 18-wheel rigs. That car was an '88 model, and I haven't seen any Honda, hybrid or otherwise, come close in all the years since.
Post a Comment